Massachusetts Property IUA (PRIVATE.MPI)

Overall impact
D (28)

Commentary

Massachusetts Property IUA is a below-average overall performer. With a 'D' rating of 27.5 for overall impact (bottom 10% of all companies), Massachusetts Property IUA ranks 73rd out of 82 industry peers, behind Kingsway Financial Services, QBE Insurance, Insurance Australia and 69 others, and ahead of WR Berkley, SafePort, Kin and 6 others. On top material causes for Massachusetts Property IUA's industry (Insurance), Massachusetts Property IUA performs poorly in Affordable, Safe Housing (10.3 score), Improved Mental Health (35.1), Fair Labor Practices (20.2) and 8 other causes where it received a 'D' or 'F' score. Massachusetts Property IUA did not receive an 'A' rating on any cause.
Impact
Cause PRIVATE.MPI
Peer rank
Overall impact

Log in to view this information

Impact trend

Change in rating for overall impact

Log in to view this information

Company
Founded
1968
Employees
74
Sector
Financials
Industry
Insurance
Sub-industry
Property & Casualty Insurance
SASB industry
Insurance
Headquarters
Massachusetts, United States
Share classes
PRIVATE.MPI
Description
The Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Association (MPIUA) is a residual market insurance association in which all companies writing basic property insurance in the Commonwealth are required to participate with losses shared among the member companies on a premium volume basis. Responding to Federal Legislation, the Massachusetts Legislature in 1968 called for an urban area insurance placement facility and thereby gave rise to MPIUA. MPIUA is also known as FAIR Plan (Fair Access to Insurance Requirements). The FAIR Plan operates similar to that of a normal insurance company in that it underwrites and inspects risks, accepts premium, issues policies and adjusts claims. It has a seasoned professional staff, which provides exceptional service to its clientele. FAIR Plans are the outgrowth of the national emergency created by three years of rioting in American cities, beginning with the Watts outbreak in 1965. When the rioting of the 1960s suddenly mushroomed to disastrous proportions, the companies found themselves in the position of having to pay losses in excess of $100 million, on which they had collected no specific premium. Although the companies paid these losses, their capacity was severely taxed and their normal riot reinsurance market had dried up. It became obvious that emergency revisions of underwriting and reinsurance procedures were necessary for the future protection of urban property and urban existence.
Material causes
Ethos considers the following causes material for Massachusetts Property IUA, based on its industry sub-industry Property & Casualty Insurance. Learn more about material causes in our methodology overview.

This information is subject to Ethos' Terms and Conditions, which you can find here.

This information may not be used for corporate financing purposes (including, without limitation, ESG-linked loans, credit facilities, securities or structured products), as a basis for any financial instruments or products (including, without limitation, passively managed funds and index-linked derivative securities) or other products or services, to verify or correct data in any other compilation of data or index, to create any derivative works, nor to create any other data or index (custom or otherwise), without Ethos' prior written permission.

By browsing this site you agree to our use of cookies. Read more.
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Give me more info.